***Spoiler Alert*** If you have not seen Inception, but intend to, read no further.
In the end, was it a dream or was Leo's return to his children a reality? Was that damn top about to topple over and provide a happy ending for Dom Cobb?
Without a true sense of closure, we are left with only theory. A recent discussion I had with a friend of mine revolved around his insistence that Cobb did indeed return to his children, and that totem was just about to tip over.
I disagree entirely.
First off, when Cobb touches down at the airport and is taken to his children, the scene is just a bit too perfect, too idyllic, too...well, dreamlike. When he enters the home, he finds his children are not only the same age as when he last saw them, but are wearing the same exact clothes. Earlier in the movie, Cobb references having been away from his kids for years. Considering both children appear to be in the 4-6 age range, they would look considerably different after even just two years. As well, there isn't a chance in hell that those same clothes would fit them. From a practical perspective, the only way Dom could have returned to his children and find them in the exact same state that he left them in is in either a dream or by use of a time machine. And since this is Chris Nolan's movie and not H.G. Wells,' I'm going with the former.
Of course, the preceding paragraph is an evidence based argument as opposed to an artistic one. In considering the latter, I think it's important to consider Nolan's modus operandi.
***Spoiler Alert part deux*** If you have not seen Memento, Insomnia, or The Dark Knight, or have been living under a rock, read no further.
In Memento, the tortured character played by Guy Pearce is searching for the murderer of his wife while dealing with the after effects of the beating he took when his wife was killed--leaving him with a horrendous case of short term memory loss. At the end of the film, Pearce's character makes a conscious decision to NOT resolve the mystery because to do so would leave him with no purpose in life. He chooses the lie.
In Nolan's follow up film, Insomnia (a remake of a Norwegian film by the same name), the police officer played by Al Pacino "accidentally" shoots his partner while tracking a serial killer in Alaska. As the film continues, Pacino is less and less certain if he shot his fellow detective on accident or on purpose. His partner was due to testify against Pacino in an internal affairs case that could end his career. In the end, as his character has become disoriented by the constant sunlight of the Alaskan summer, the obsessive nature of the serial killer chase, and his own guilt, he is still unsure of his own motives. Was the shooting an accident? Probably so. But was there a part of him that was satisfied that his partner would not be able to testify against him? Yes, indeed. As the local cop played by Hilary Swank stands over top of his dying body, he tells her not to "lose her way" like he did. Not to choose the lie.
In Nolan's most popular film to date, The Dark Knight, he takes a near sociopathic look at the Batman character played by Christian Bale. The movie asks many questions about vigilantism , torture, and the duality of man. Batman believes that Gotham City needs a "white knight" to counteract his darker version of criminal justice. He finds such a man in District Attorney, Harvey Dent, played so well by Aaron Eckhardt. However, later in the film when Dent is disfigured by the Joker and the love of his life murdered, Eckhardt loses his mind and becomes "Two-Face." He then goes on a murderous spree deciding the fate of his victims with the toss of a coin. During the film's climax, Batman saves Lieutenant Gordon's family from Two-Face, and kills him in the process. Knowing that if Dent's diabolical conversion is made public that it would be a severe blow to the citizens of Gotham City, Batman convinces Gordon to let him take the rap for the murders. Once again, the character chooses the lie.
Obviously, this is a consistent theme in Nolan's films. Characters who choose the lie because it is more expedient, or simply less painful. They sacrifice honesty for a seemingly less complicated option. Of course, that choice is fraught with it's own perplexity. How long can you live a lie before it destroys you (Insomnia), or potentially drives you to the brink of madness (Inception, The Dark Knight, Memento)?
This is what makes Nolan perhaps the most fascinating mainstream filmmaker around. His unwillingness to provide clean answers. But the answers are there, you just have to dig for them, and accept that the result may well be a grim one.
You have to be willing to accept the conclusion that Dom Cobb reaches in Inception. He chooses the lie.
Sumo-Pop
August 5, 2010
Barry Skalski likes this.
ReplyDeleteI agree with that person. Lots of other reasons to support that theory.
ReplyDeletewhat other reasons are you thinking of?
ReplyDeleteThere are a lot of people here who haven't had a chance to watch the film yet, so it would be unfair to discuss it here and spoil the film for them, but we have discussed that on the board a while ago. =)
ReplyDeleteIf the ending of Inception seems uncertain, it's probably intentional. If so, the point of the ending lies in its uncertainty!
ReplyDeleteGo on to the board, Richard, and share your point of view.
ReplyDelete"happy end" version is too simple, I agree with the article
ReplyDeletejust waiting for that sequal......;)
ReplyDeleteNo to the sequel!
ReplyDeleteKinda have to agree with this. Saw it this past Monday. Thought it was pretty good, but left with the same feeling you discuss here. Other than that, check out this link: http://videogum.com/208132/caught-inception-ripped-off-scrooge-mcduck/remakes-and-spinoffs/
ReplyDeleteI have not seen memento or insomnia, so I had to stop reading... however, I am intrigued by your title and your line of thinking in the first few paragraphs (beyond the fact that you obviously have too much time on your hands to analyze a m...ovie so deeply). "Choosing the lie" is the original sin of man. The intriguing paradox to this movie is that Leo chose the lie for the sake of his children IN SPITE of the woman, as opposed to Adam choosing the lie BECAUSE of the woman. So, does this propose an evolution in the morality of man? (chew before swallowing
ReplyDeleteHA! "beyond the fact that you obviously have too much time on your hands to analyze a m...ovie so deeply" This from a guy who pores over Prince lyrics like he's going to find the cure for cancer. :)
ReplyDeleteThe thing is to me, is that he's choosin...g the dream version of his children, not the real version. I think there's a reason why he walks away from the spinning top...he doesn't want to know the answer.
@Jason, that's crazy!
ReplyDeleteInception didn't become a blockbuster by accident! Leonardo and writer-director Chris Nolan had the chemistry to collaborate for months, building it out of little more than a rough sketch! Whether they develop a sequel that meets their test of originality, re-visit Heath Ledger's creative legacy in The Dark Knight, or take the longer route of starting from scratch, Leonardo and Nolan are an established Hollywood team: fans of Inception want to see their team on the field!
ReplyDeleteOh, come on, Richard, a rough sketch??? The man worked on the script for years!!! LOL If you were like pinocchio, you'd be in trouble.
ReplyDeleteInception turned out just a bit different on-screen than in the first script, Catarina! Well frankly, more than just a bit! Nothing less than months of collaboration between Leonardo and Nolan, turned a project into a movie! Gotta like Leonardo's modesty, but his input into the screenplay was clearly massive!
ReplyDeleteCool! He's like king Midas. Everything he touches turns to gold. =)
ReplyDeleteBut let us not call it a "rough sketch". lol
I remember he stepped down in favour of his friend Mark Whalberg, for the nomination of best supporting actor Oscar category, in ...2007. His humility is one of his best qualities, yes. ♥
Inception turned out just a bit different on-screen than in the first script, Catarina! Well frankly, more than just a bit! Nothing less than months of collaboration between Leonardo and Nolan, turned a project into a movie! Gotta like Leonardo's modesty, but his input into the screenplay was clearly massive!
ReplyDeleteI agree, but you don't have to go to Memento to deduce this; the movie is self-contained, everything you need to understand what happened is in the movie.
ReplyDeletehttp://bit.ly/bTWySv
follow the children's shoes
Catarina Magalhães http://www.facebook.com/board.php?uid=9085937115&f=2#!/topic.php?uid=9085937115&topic=15428
ReplyDeleteI must be honest, I didn´t check the story so completely by watching first time. But I think that I checked that the final was back in reality.
ReplyDeleteIf so, how come the kids didn't age or even change their clothes?
ReplyDeleteI hope he don't dream but I think about the facts that he's died and live in his dreams....
ReplyDeleteOkay, maybe I´ll still don´t check the story. Maybe I´ll watch it again on DVD. I was so involved in watching Leo on a big screen. I heard that Leo had to read the book also three times so I don´t think I am stupid because of that.
ReplyDeleteSorry but nobody had ever said that you are stupid. I have checked the movie at first time but I will see the movie at second time with my boy friend in the cinema this saturday, because he is at the moment in england to working. INCEPTION a great movie!!!
ReplyDeleteDid anyone notice that: when in a dream cobb was wearing a wedding ring, meanwhile when he was in reality, there was no wedding ring on his finger?
ReplyDeleteAnd on the very last scene, where his kids turned around, there was no ring on his finger.
However, in saying that, due to the totem is still spinning when the scene went black, I think that the reason he was not wearing a wedding ring on that last scene, due to he already be able to forget/let go of his wife in dreams. That is why let's say even when he was still dreaming, he would not be wearing a wedding ring anymore.
The kids were wearing the same clothes, however on the very last scene, their shoes were different shoes. LOL!!!
I'm telling you, Christopher Nolan is OH MY GOD! LOL!
Hmm ok thats your meaning...but I think it's not right what you are writing....
ReplyDeleteyou really checked that there are different shoes ? I already heard of those intensive-watchers but that this goes sooo far I would never have thought. I´m impressed.
ReplyDeleteA very interesting movie. You just cant get enough. It's worth watching the 2nd/3rd times.
ReplyDeleteAnd the more you discuss with your friends, the more questions mark. Hahaha.
I think we just have to choose our own ending, either we would like it sad, or happy. Personally, I think he is still dreaming.
@Sandra: I watched 3 times so far. LOL!!!
ReplyDeleteYes I think he is dreaming, too.....
ReplyDeleteaxo... but I think that earns respect. I can watch films as often as I want I will never check what shoes they wore. people as you are those who find out the mistakes be regie. by German Marienhof for example there are often many mistkaes. One time I walked around at three sides at the same time. Normally I should have said something but I wanted to be in picture. *hehe*
ReplyDelete@Sandra: LOL!!!! thank you
ReplyDeleteOne more thing: if you guys go to IMDB websites, there are 2 sets of actors playing Cobb's kids.
ReplyDelete1. Clair Geare as phillipa 3 years old
2. Magnus Nolan as James 20 months old
and for the last scene:
1. Taylor Geare as Philipa 5 years old
2. Jonathan Geare as James 3 years old
Sigh. We can never really find out the truth about the ending. We have to ask Nolan himself. Or he probably doesnt even know too. LOL!!!
Ähmmmm hello its a forum to discuss....and not to make meanings of other people sad....
ReplyDeleteIf I could remember where his body was before the final I think I could know that. I don´t think he would have come back by having a big psychose even if it´s a very surreal film.
ReplyDelete